South Africa: Al-Qaeda Training in South Africa

 

South Africa: Hawks Mum On Al-Qaeda Probe Report

13 May 2013

 

Johannesburg -

 

    The Hawks have declined to comment on a report that police and the State

Security Agency (SSA) monitored training of al-Qaeda "terrorists" in South

Africa without taking action.

 

"No comment. It's not our policy to talk about works underway," Hawks

spokesman Captain Paul Ramaloko said on Monday, reiterating what he told the

online publication Daily Maverick, which published the report.

 

The Daily Maverick reported that the police's crimes against the state unit

and the SSA had been monitoring activities at a farm near the notorious

apartheid police hit-squad camp Vlakplaas, outside Pretoria, and at a

secluded farm in the Klein Karoo.

 

"Operation Kanu" was reportedly launched to "investigate extremist Muslim

activities" in South Africa, shortly after the 9/11 World Trade Centre

attacks in the United States, and was crime intelligence driven.

 

It began at the same time as a parallel investigation into far right-wing

activities, called "Operation Waco", which led to the marathon Boeremag

treason trial.

 

British and US intelligence agencies reportedly pressured the South African

government into acting against any possible Muslim terrorist threats

emanating from within the country, and warned South Africa to stop

"pussyfooting" on the issue.

 

"The fact that no bombs have gone off to date in the country doesn't mean

that the threat doesn't exist within South Africa's borders," they

reportedly warned.

 

The Daily Maverick reported that "at the centre of this alleged terrorist

network are several members of the well-known and influential Dockrat

family".

 

It traced the family's ownership of fashion chains and noted its choice of a

mosque popular among Pakistani and Malawian Muslims.

 

It reported that Farhad and Junaid Dockrat's names were forwarded to the

United Nations' Security Council's Al-Qaeda and Taliban sanctions committee

for designation, but that South Africa put an indefinite hold on the

designation process.

 

The Dockrats reportedly denied links to al-Qaeda or any other militant

groups.

 

According to the online publication, three months after they were put on a

US "terrorist list" in 2007, the Dockrats moved their operation from

Pretoria to the farm, Greylock, in the Klein Karoo.

 

There, they were monitored by an intelligence team pretending to search for

a rare species of Protea.

 

There was a court dispute over a communal water line and the Dockrats later

bought a 70 percent share of the developing Tsitsikamma Golf Estate.

 

Investment reportedly ground to a halt, and the home owners' association was

in dispute with them, claiming Tsitsikamma had been declared a "possible

terrorist hotspot" by the US and this was affecting tourism.

 

In a comment to the Daily Maverick about the Tsitsikamma matter, the company

which owns the golf estate said it welcomed all investigations and would

fully co-operate with the authorities.

 

"We trust that the Daily Maverick is not being driven by an Islamophobic

attack generated by a commercial venture of the Tsitsikamma Golf Estate,

which has been placed under care and maintenance arising from the current

economic climate; a fate suffered by numerous golf estates," the company was

reported to have said.

 

==========================================

(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this

message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to

these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed

within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with

"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.

The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The

Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain

permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials

if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,

teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria

for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies

as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four

criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is

determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not

substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use

copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you

must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS

PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.