Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Hizbollah's quandary over Israel retaliation in Syria

 

Analysis: Hizbollah's quandary over Israel retaliation in Syria

Israel's air raids on Hizbollah targets inside Syria have landed one of its

most dangerous foes with an agonising dilemma.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10040238/Analysis-Hizbollahs-quandary-over-Israel-retaliation-in-Syria.html

 

 

By David Blair, Chief Foreign Correspondent

 

10:18PM BST 06 May 2013

 

For years, the radical Shia movement has painstakingly amassed an arsenal of

Iranian-supplied weaponry. Today, Hizbollah has tens of thousands of

missiles carefully stockpiled in south Lebanon and readied for use against

Israel.

 

If Hassan Nasrallah, the Hizbollah leader and a man who once basked in the

adoration of the Arab world, is not prepared to launch his deadly armoury

now, then when might he ever do so? He must decide whether to retaliate for

the air strikes by bombarding Israel - and almost certainly starting a

regional war - or sitting tight and risking the appearance of a paper tiger.

 

Israel clearly believes that Mr Nasrallah will choose caution. Benjamin

Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, authorised the raids on Syria and

then nonchalantly flew to China on a visit that will keep him away until

Friday. This was not the behaviour of a leader who believes his country to

be on the brink of war.

 

Israel has moved two of its five Iron Dome missile defence batteries near

the border with Lebanon. But General Yair Golan, the head of Israeli

Northern Command, told journalists that he did not sense any "winds of war".

He spoke while joining the annual fun run for the Golani Brigade - again,

hardly the behaviour of a general who thinks he is about to fight.

 

Instead, Israel senses the prospect of a strategic victory over Hizbollah.

Mr Nasrallah faces his dilemma at a uniquely testing moment.

 

Hizbollah gets its weapons from Iran, but they must reach Lebanon across

Syrian territory. If President Bashar al-Assad goes, so might this vital

supply route.

 

The leaders of post-Assad Syria will almost certainly be drawn from the

country's Sunni majority, who are not natural allies of Shia Hizbollah, and

still less of Iran.

 

The fact that Mr Nasrallah has sent his men to Syria to fight alongside the

current regime almost guarantees him the enmity of any future ruler.

 

The possible loss of his supply line will alter Mr Nasrallah's calculations.

 

When he started the last war with Israel in 2006, he knew that every missile

he fired could be replaced by Iran - as indeed they were. This time, there

might be no new supply of rockets down the road from Syria.

 

Fortunately for Mr Nasrallah, he has another option. Every so often, an

incident lifts the veil on Hizbollah's covert campaign against Israeli

interests worldwide. In March, one operative was convicted in Cyprus for

scouting out Israeli targets on the island.

 

As a middle way between doing nothing and firing off his arsenal, Mr

Nasrallah could escalate his movement's efforts to attack Israeli tourists

and diplomats.

 

That is hardly a rerun of the glory days of 2006, when he claimed to have

taken on Israel and won. In his current predicament, however, Mr Nasrallah

may have little choice.

 

==========================================

(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this

message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to

these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed

within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with

"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.

The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The

Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain

permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials

if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,

teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria

for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies

as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four

criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is

determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not

substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use

copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you

must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS

PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.

 

 

 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment